Mowing Down The Urban Forest
By Val Werier
The Winnipeg Free Press
April, 2002

Every so often we witness the destruction of a part of our urban forest and communities are outraged that this should happen in our city. The history of Winnipeg is marked by such injury to our environment.

Some of these transgressions have been thwarted by a concerned public and dedicated politicians understanding of our natural environment. But the chopping of our urban forest continues because there is still a tendency to regard land as a commodity to be graded like fried chicken or soap, a comparison raised decades ago by Douglas Fullerton, head of the National Capital Commission, Ottawa.

We have few restrictions on the removal of old forests in private hands no matter how relevant to our history and character of the city. It may be an irreplaceable heritage as in the eradication of much of a 30-acre riverbottom forest ten years ago where basswood have flourished for 1,000 years. Yes, 1,000 years! The trees were removed to make way for a development between Roblin Boulevard and Assiniboine River.

History also reveals that a determined public and politicians-and if I may say journalists-have saved our national treasures from development.

At the turn of the century, the Winnipeg Electric Co. established River Park, an amusement centre, including a dance pavilion and horse racing along the Red River at the foot of Osborne Street. The purpose was to attract riders to the street car system. The park was in an unsettled part of the city, a lovely place in the woods. As the city grew, the company decided to sell this valuable property for a housing development.

Among the opponents to this venture was N.B. Zimmerman, a Winnipeg Tribune editorial writer, a man with a good feeling about his native city. He wrote: "The big chance to recapture more of our rivers is in River Park. …There would be no keep-off signs and barbed wire to block our hunger for the Red. It is our river, ever since in school, Whittier's poem made it a thing of legend and nostalgia." (John Greenleaf Whittier, 1807-1892, was a poet from Massachusetts who wrote a poem about the Red River when he visited here.)

Bolstered by such support, city council refused to allow the wooded park to be cut up into lots. It purchased 19 acres for $40,000 and it became Churchill Park. Several decades later, in 1964, with no public discussion, traffic consultants wanted to bisect the park with a freeway to a proposed bridge. As a columnist for the Winnipeg Tribune, I was instrumental in defeating this proposal.

Today we witness a similar transgression in the bulldozing of an 18-metre swath through a forest along the banks of the Seine River in St. Boniface for a bridge to a future development. It was a shocking intrusion, considering that the city had been discussing options with Ladco, the owners, to acquire this 80-acre tract for a park. The floodland section along the river is protected from development. Ladco is in violation for bulldozing into the floodlands without obtaining the required permit.

Members of Save Our Seine were outraged. SOS, in a wonderful public service, has planted thousands of trees and shrubs along the river and removed rubbish to make it navigable. "The oaks cut down," says Jules Legal, head of SOS, "date from the time of Louis Riel." And earlier in history, too. Here are bur oaks 150 to 200 years old. Mike Allen, former city forester, calls it an "exceptional" forest, one of the best in the city for it is relatively undisturbed. There is concern in the city administration to preserve our heritage. Over the years, riverbank property has been acquired and placed in the public domain.

But there are no teeth in any legislation to protect the forests as in other jurisdictions where caveats are placed on removal of heritage forests in private hands. At the very least, we need a bylaw protecting trees, which would require approval before any trees of significance are removed, whether on private or public property.

It is unacceptable that city development guidelines are silent on such basic issues as protection of our heritage and the environment. Such protection should be included in agreements from the start, a protection emphasized in Plan Winnipeg. Trees are not a commodity like others. They belong to the community.




Back to In the Media


Back to Main